Saturday, July 23, 2005

I Can't Say it Any Better

I can't say any of this better than Victor Davis Hanson already has. Here are some key excerpts from his latest op/ed at NRO entitled "And Then They Came After Us -
We’re at war. How about acting like it?":
When the U.N. and the EU talked about “refugee camps,” none asked why for a half-century the Arab world could not build decent housing for its victimized brethren, or why 1 million Arabs voted in Israel, but not one freely in any Arab country.
Perhaps the jihadist killing was not over the West Bank or U.S. hegemony after all, but rather symptoms of a global pathology of young male Islamic radicals blaming all others for their own self-inflicted miseries, convinced that attacks on the infidel would win political concessions, restore pride, and prove to Israelis, Europeans, Americans — and about everybody else on the globe — that Middle Eastern warriors were full of confidence and pride after all.

Meanwhile an odd thing happened. It turns out that the jihadists were cowards and bullies, and thus selective in their targets of hatred. A billion Chinese were left alone by radical Islam — even though the Chinese were secularists and mostly godless, as well as ruthless to their own Uighur Muslim minorities. Had bin Laden issued a fatwa against Beijing and slammed an airliner into a skyscraper in Shanghai, there is no telling what a nuclear China might have done.
Typical after the London bombing is the ubiquitous Muslim spokesman who when asked to condemn terrorism, starts out by deploring such killing, assuring that it has nothing to do with Islam, yet then ending by inserting the infamous “but” — as he closes with references about the West Bank, Israel, and all sorts of mitigating factors. Almost no secular Middle Easterners or religious officials write or state flatly, “Islamic terrorism is murder, pure and simple evil. End of story, no ifs or buts about it.”

Second, thinking that the jihadists will target only Israel eventually leads to emboldened attacks on the United States. Assuming America is the only target assures terrorism against Europe. Civilizations will either hang separately or triumph over barbarism together. It is that simple — and past time for Europe and the United States to rediscover their common heritage and shared aims in eradicating this plague of Islamic fascism.

Third, Islamicists are selective in their attacks and hatred. So far global jihad avoids two billion Indians and Chinese, despite the fact that their countries are far tougher on Muslims than is the United States or Europe. In other words, the Islamicists target those whom they think they can intimidate and blackmail.
Go read the entire article here.

4 Comments:

Blogger Laura said...

If these people were so brave, they wouldn't hide their faces behind their scarves; they would go up against armies, not civilian men, women, and/or children.

These 'people' are not, in my most humbled opinion, brave; but 100% cowards.

6:29 AM  
Blogger BobF said...

The Chinese couldn't care less what the rest of the world thinks. They haven't changed their policies or attitudes and they still have the rest of the world kissing their butts because of the "market" over there.

If Osama had attacked China that 200 million man army referenced in the Battle of Armageddon, coming from the East, would have been made its début.

1:33 AM  
Blogger Mae said...

Bob, you and I both know that is exactly why the ragheads don't mess with China. They know the Chi-comms don't give a rat's ass about public opinion and would not hesitate to obliterate a muslim city or country.

11:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wonderful and informative web site. I used information from that site its great. acuvue 2+colour lenses Iceland+casinos roulette tracking cards Georgetown municipal utilities ca the payout roulette mature free nudes 16ft black stripe sunsetter motorized retractable awning

4:22 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home